Most people assume that the case study analysis is the type of analysis they can do at home and just copy and paste their findings. They assume that someone, somewhere has already done it, and they don’t know what it takes to create a truly original case study. In actuality, one can follow many strategies to write a superb case study analysis.
A problem many writers have is to come up with original case studies for their material. Case studies are not all created equal. The quality of case studies is directly related to the author’s research skills and his ability to set forth facts clearly and convincingly.
Case studies can be divided into two categories: those which are “coherent” and those which are “apparent.” Coherent case studies are the ones that describe the subject or phenomena in a comprehensible way. Apparent case studies are those which are illustrated by a series of simplified diagrams, drawings, diagrams, and graphs. Coherent case studies use a mixture of these methods, while apparent case studies only use a single method.
One of the key ways to succeed with case studies is to take notes on the professor’s lectures and seminars. Many professors have books in their libraries, which are very helpful in case studies. One can study their classroom lectures using a number of strategies including research, analogies, and case studies.
Law students can also create case studies based on readings and case studies in their legal curriculum. What is interesting about legal teaching is that the law changes rapidly and situations constantly change. The old law often has new applications, which are rarely mentioned in a professor’s lectures.
Looking up case studies in cases in the current law is another great strategy for researching recent cases. In addition, the law library and law school websites are also great sources of case studies.
Another strategy for researching the history of an issue is to use case studies to make the entire case. For example, if you want to discuss free speech in the media, use an apparent case study to explain the importance of free speech. When you have completed an apparent case study, summarize it in the paper using a sub-title, a quote, or a headline.
Consider a social commentator who is critical of the religion of Islam and the manner in which they practice their faith. The reader may notice the culture clash as it relates to some practices and their use of symbols in the religion. The commentator points out the cultural conflicts and concerns in this particular situation, and the case study is complete.
Also consider a case study that is made up of two very different sub-titles. In one case study, the writer discusses several different issues, including constitutional, social, and economic issues. In another case study, the writer states the author has no time for “fuss and hurry.”
The first two strategies above are very good for case study analysis. In a third case study, the writer states that he is writing this article on a special topic and gives a sub-title. In a fourth case study, the writer makes a series of sub-titles and provides key phrases to clarify the meaning of the article.
The writer has gathered several issues related to this unique topic and gives a full sub-title for each article. Case study analysis is powerful if it is done well.